Front and Back Matter

Front Matter

Transmittal Letter

Color Correction Recommendation Report Memorandem

To: Professor Janie Santoy

From: Armando Barrera

Date: April 20, 2009

Subject: Recommendation Report for Color Correction Tutorial

This memo contains a recommendation report on the Color Correction Tutorial. It also consists of a full walk through of my findings and thoughts; as well as a review of my recommendations.

I have examined and carefully separated this report into three different sections: (1.) Memorability, (2.) Learnability, and (3) Satisfaction. The report goes into further detail by describing the methodology (test plan), my own findings, the conclusion, and my recommendation.

Following the report, I am confident that the tutorial will have gone through a stage under the microscope and come out more efficient. My recommendation will also serve as a stepping stone for improvement and success.

Cover

Color Correction Tutorial Recommendation Report

Armando Barrera

April 20, 2009

Title Page

Color Correction Recommendation Report

Prepared by: Armando Barrera

Student of: T.S.T.C. Harlingen, Texas

April 20, 2009

Prepared for: Janie Santoy

Foreword/Abstract:

This recommendation report analyzes the Color Correction Tutorial for Adobe Photoshop, and or, other similar softwares. The report will discuss the usability test which I conducted on the tutorial. The purpose of this report is to recommend changes or further improvements that need to be made based on the results of the test. I have examined and carefully separated this report into three different sections: (1.) Memorability, (2.) Learnability, and (3) Satisfaction. This report will consist of examples for each of the three different categories. This report also examines the methodology (test plan), my own findings, the conclusion, and my recommendations of the tutorial.

Summary/Executive Summary:

This recommendation report analyzes the Color Correction Tutorial for Adobe Photoshop, and or, other similar softwares. The tutorial instructs and teaches the reader how to color correct their images/pictures. The main goal is to manipulate color by either toning down shades or more importantly making colors more attractive and vibrant. The purpose of the recommendation report is to provide insights so that the creator of the tutorial will know how and what changes need to be made. From there the creator can make improvements that will determine better efficiency for the tutorial.

Table of Contents

Abstract

Executive Summary

Introduction


MEELS

Methodology

Findings

Conclusion

Recommendations


Work Cited

List of Illustrations

Back Matter

Works Cited

1. Mauerer, R. (2002). "Usability Testing." University of Colorado System. Provides an example from https://www.cu.edu/irm/stds/usability/index.html. Taken on 1/08/2009.

2. Spool, J. (2005). "Seven Common Usability Testing Mistakes." User Interface Engineering. Provides an example from http://www.uie.com/articles/usability_testing_mistakes/. Taken on 1/08/2009.


3. Kaufman, J. (2006). "Practical Usability Testing." Digital Web Magazine. Provides an example from http://www.digital-web.com/articles/practical_usability_testing/. Taken on 1/08/2009.

Intro and Body Sections

Intro Section:

This recommendation report presents the findings from the usability test on color correction.
Here is an overview of my report:
1. Summary
2. Introduction
3. Methodology
4. Test Results
5. Recommendations

The purpose of this test was to see if someone can follow a set of instructions and apply what they've learned immediately. My final report will consist of a summary on methodology, test findings, and recommendations.

I decided to test a few students from T.S.T.C. to see how well the tutorial flows. The goal is to find out how efficient the video is as well as the learnability factor. The data will be examined and used to determine if changes need to be made or recommendations are required.


Body Section:


The two MEELS that I have chosen were efficiency and learnability. I found these to be extremely important to the success of this tutorial. Mainly because it's hard to follow something has isn't put together well. I chose the learnability MEEL primarily because it's difficult to learn and want to learn something that is too hard/lengthy.

Recommendations:

Analysis of Research

I thought that the client did a good job on trying to keep things simple and to the point. Some areas needed improvement but nothing major. I think some areas towards the middle of the tutorial needed substeps so that the reader can break them down. If a section is too hard for them to follow, it will be easier if they are offered a better starting point.

References for Recommendation Report

References for Recommendation Report:

1. Mauerer, R. (2002). "Usability Testing." University of Colorado System. Provides an example from https://www.cu.edu/irm/stds/usability/index.html. Taken on 1/08/2009.

2. Spool, J. (2005). "Seven Common Usability Testing Mistakes." User Interface Engineering. Provides an example from http://www.uie.com/articles/usability_testing_mistakes/. Taken on 1/08/2009.


3. Kaufman, J. (2006). "Practical Usability Testing." Digital Web Magazine. Providedes an example from http://www.digital-web.com/articles/practical_usability_testing/. Taken on 1/08/2009.

Main Sections of Report

A recommendation report is a report that is constructed for some type of need. One would write a report such as this to determine an outcome or opinion about something that is to be used. They are often used to suggest a decision between something that has been tested and approved; while also conveying the view of the writer on the subject.

Main sections of Recommendation report:
1. Introduction
2. Technical Background
3. Background on the situation
4. Requirements and Criteria
5. Discussion of the Options
6. Category-by-Category Comparisons
7. Conclusions
8. Recommendation or Final Opinion

Test Notes

Notes on Usability Test Subjects:

Test Subject One:
1. He looks a little overwhelmed by the whole task
2. Subject is having a little trouble following the written tutorial
3. He asked if all the computer parts were available to use
4. Subject is looking more confident; working at a faster pace
5. He got confused when attaching wires in the box/tower. Asked for help.
6. He asked which wires went where. Got most of them wrong. Asked for help.

Subject Two:
1. Subject asks if all the pc parts present/accounted for
2. Looks confused as to the order of the tutorial
3. Forgot what the microprocessor was and where it belongs. Asked for help.
4. Having trouble installing the CD-R drive
5. Hasn't made too many mistakes. Hasn't asked for help in a long while